Curiosity before engagement
Do not confuse clicks, time spent or completion with meaningful curiosity.
Emerging methodology
These principles are the current applied interpretation of the research. Some are supported by established literature; their specific combination in the Curiosity Engine remains a project hypothesis.
Do not confuse clicks, time spent or completion with meaningful curiosity.
Begin with the object, place, word, date or visible feature before moving toward themes.
Explain why a connection exists before using evocative language to make it memorable.
The original object or question should remain the organising centre of exploration.
Do not begin with an abstract topic menu; let motifs gather meaning through exploration.
A coherent story must not make a weak interpretation appear to be established fact.
An unexpected connection should deepen understanding rather than remain clever trivia.
Test the interaction in the cheapest useful form before investing in architecture or polish.
The critical distinction
| Navigation question | Curiosity architecture question |
|---|---|
| What can I click? | Which visible detail opens a meaningful relationship? |
| Where does this link lead? | Why does the connection exist? |
| What content is next? | How will this change the original interpretation? |
| How do I complete the path? | What question am I now able to ask? |
Evidence vocabulary
Object records, documented facts and reliable historical context.
A reasonable synthesis grounded in evidence, but not necessarily a documented statement of original intention.
A bounded comparison that reveals a shared pattern while keeping historical and functional differences visible.